Side-by-Side Comparison

Before & After: Values-Informed Communication

See exactly how generic HR approaches fail — and how values-informed strategies succeed. Each example shows the same situation handled two ways, with analysis of why one works and the other doesn't.

Organizational Change

Merger Announcement

Generic HR Approach
Generic Change Management
Example Communication

"We are excited to announce that our company will be merging with XYZ Corp. This is a great opportunity for growth. Details will be shared as they become available. We appreciate your patience during this transition."

Why This Fails
  • No acknowledgment of job security concerns
  • Vague timeline creates anxiety
  • No mention of what stays the same
  • Excitement framing ignores employee fear
Values-Informed Approach
Values-Informed Communication
Example Communication

"We want to share important news about our company's future — and be direct with you about what it means. We are merging with XYZ Corp. Here is what we know today: [list of 5 specific things that are not changing]. Here is what we are still working through: [honest list]. Here is our commitment to you: we will communicate every decision that affects your role within 48 hours of making it. Your manager will meet with you individually this week."

Why This Works
  • Directly addresses Financial Security (80%) and Employment Security (59%)
  • Provides 'What's NOT Changing' list — activates Loyalty (66%)
  • Commits to individual communication — activates Relationships (82%)
  • Honest about unknowns — builds trust with Personal Responsibility types (70%)
Return on Values Impact

Organizations using values-aligned change communication see +22% trust and +20% engagement vs. generic announcements.

1 of 7

Want to apply this thinking to your specific challenge?